|
The
article below was written in 2000 and was published in Ceramic Review issue
196. It came about as a means of documenting my explorations into clay bodies
for use in extended woodfirings.
The perfect Body
For the last three years, myself, Paul McAllister, Stephen Parry, Jim Gladwin
and David Scott have collectively been firing the 68cu ft anagama kiln built
in 1998 by Izumihara Masanobu. The kiln is sited in the grounds of Wysing
Arts near Cambridge. This article will hopefully convey some of the research
that I have carried out into clays, which utilize the atmospheres, generated
though a protracted wood firing. This investigation was embarked upon as a
result of being unable to find a pre formulated commercial clay, which would
satisfactorily achieve the surfaces we were looking for.
In an anagama wood firing with a reasonably long duration, there are many
variables: the path of the flame, the length of the flame, the length of slow
burn and the length of fast burn, the structure of the pack, the duration
of the overall melt and the types of wood used (We use a mixture of soft wood:
Great Fir and Scots pine with approx. 10% hard wood in our case, walnut for
the coaling properties; all are slab wood off cuts.).
Some of the early firings of the anagama kiln were, with hindsight, carried
out with a type of gung-ho naivety. Using predominantly white St. Thomas from
Potclays, The Crank/Raku body from Les Bainbridge Ceramics and a standard
white stoneware used in the Ceramics Department at Loughborough University
School of Art and Design. All these clays were great for making and they worked
well in the salt kiln and the down draft wood fired kiln, as well as in standard
oxidised and reduced firings. However, when they were subjected to the anagama
firing they yielded very disappointing results.
The St. Thomas took the
temperature well (about 1400C at the front and over 1300C at the back), but
tended towards a very flat grey, although it took on a little more colour
at the front of the kiln just beyond the reach of the coals. This clay did
not utilise the amounts of ash that it had been subjected to, especially in
areas that achieved the most heat and movement by the flame. It was also very
prone to what can only be described as a skinning on the surface. A very dry
puckering of the clay surface which, if chipped with a fingernail, would crumble
off.
The crank developed some seductive colours in areas of the kiln, which in
the earlier firings reached around cone 10, but were very prone to producing
a flat shiny dark brown. It was not a good recorder of the flame's path. Generally
the ash, which landed on pots, sat and moved only a little although provided
some lovely dry olive greens. The white St. Thomas produced runs right at
the front of the kiln but further down the kiln gave only, in our eyes, a
rather insipid dry pumice grey. Glazes, which had a relatively high alumina
content and low flux content tended to crystallise massively in the cooling
of the kiln and shiver off.
It was all very perplexing. It became apparent to us all that when undertaking
firings of this nature, much of the acquired ceramic knowledge was wildly
inadequate preparation for these extended firings. I started to experiment
using a basic white stoneware recipe. I had to test new clay bodies in our
downdraught twin fireboxed wood kiln. The kiln is fired to cone 10 in approx
18hours. Although not a close match for the anagama in duration, it was at
least fired with wood and as I used no bag walls, tests placed close to the
flame inlet could pick up a fair amount of natural ash.
The white stoneware recipe
is:
Hyplas 71 ball clay -
65
China clay - 22
Quartz - 13
To this base recipe I
added 20% nepheline syenite, which I considered to be quite a large addition.
To some of the test bodies I added percentages of AT ball clay and to others
Red earthenware powder or Potclays keuper red in to introduce varying amounts
of iron.
The resulting tests showed promise. The pots directly in the flame path showed
increased gloss due to the increased flux in the clay, far more than the white
St. Thomas (the clay being fired in the bulk of the kiln). I had dusted some
of the tests with fine sieved ash in an attempt to replicate the ash build
up in an anagama firing, these surfaces produced some good ash runs, the movement
of the ash and colour in the body was again promoted by the increased body
flux. The base white body on its own showed little flashing and remained dry
where as the clays with the small additions of either AT ball clay or red
clay and flux, indicated more of a propensity to flash from the flame impingement.
A high soda flux appears to generate the brightest colours.
For the next set of tests I tried expanding on combinations of high and low
iron bearing ball clays and flux contents, using Nepheline Syenite, Potash
feldspar and Cornish stone, keeping the quantities of china clay and quartz
static. Some of these tests again showed good results in the down draught
kiln.
The next firing of the anagama contained several of the more promising tests
from the down draught kiln. They were packed in different areas of the kiln,
so that any variance could be recorded. The pieces, which came out of this
firing, were starting to achieve what we were looking for. Plenty of ash runs
on some pieces towards the front of the kiln, some of the tests were totally
glazed and in some of the fine low iron bearing clays subtle blushes of colour.
Carbon entrapment and flame flashing were visible beneath the glassy surfaces.
The overall impression was that the pots in these new clays were coming out
bright and vibrant rather than the more sombre colours often associated with
these types of firing. The glazes which had been applied unaltered to the
new "high flux" clays, appeared to be cured of there shivering tendencies
and were giving some very rich colours and surfaces.
While on holiday in Cornwall I collected some bright yellow clay from a beach
near Falmouth. Its yellow colour indicated that there must be some iron content.
I brought it home and dried it out, slaked it down and sieved it through an
80's sieve. The resulting clay was very fine and plastic. I added 5% and 10%
additions of the Cornish clay to a high flux porcelain, which I was testing.
Even with only 5% addition the working properties of the clay were greatly
improved.
By this time some of the students and I had built a small anagama in the kiln
yard of the Ceramics Department at LUSAD. In the second firing (after a few
tweaks), we fired for 42 hours to cone 12. Some of the new addition porcelains
as well as other clays were tested in this firing. Both the 10% and 5% additions
worked well. The clays were fluxed and had integrated with the natural ash
glaze. The 5% addition mix took on a bright orange glassy surface and showed
no signs of pyro-plasticity. The addition of the found clay had also added
organic and mineral impurities, which showed themselves as veiled carbon trapping
in the glassy body. The stoneware clays also worked very well, with many colours
emerging from the ceramic surfaces. All these surfaces were a direct response
from the material, to the firing, surfaces unique in their elusive attainability.
Our next firing of the
Wysing anagama three months later contained pots made from 10 different clay
bodies. Clays were positioned in the kiln with previous knowledge of the atmosphere,
and the way that the flame moved throughout the kiln pack, so that the clays
would best utilise these factors. On opening this firing we were very pleased
with the results. Clays, which had been tested in the Loughborough anagama,
had all become richer and had brightened in the longer firing, producing wonderful
flashings under the natural ash glaze. The flame born ash had integrated well
with the fluxed bodies producing chunned glaze nipples ("dragonfly eye"
as Steve calls it), on the under sides of side fired bottles.
There had not been too much movement from the clays in their prolonged pyro-plastic
state and running ash had formed spiders webs of rivulets on the pots all
around the kiln but most strikingly at the front where I had used a 60 high
flux stoneware, 30 white St Thomas mix. The white St.Thomas addition producing
along with the oranges and whites of the No. 1 body, rich black/greys through
to titanium white with olive green ash runs which chunned where thick. All
this from the clay, the fire and the atmosphere.
Some of my glazes that have continued to be problematic are fired in open
topped saggars. The saggars protect the matt carbon trapping Shino glaze from
the direct flame on a low flux porcelain body, but allow flame born ash to
deposit on the top of the pots. The saggars are perforated to allow a little
gentle flame impingement. This has worked well with the fluid almost white
natural ash glaze contrasting with the matter carbon trapped surfaces. The
same glaze when applied to the high flux stoneware body and fired without
a saggar, produces a bright orange to brown glaze with a mother of pearl lustre
when placed in the front of the kiln, and more dramatic carbon trapped orange
and white surfaces towards the back. At last we were getting the surfaces
and qualities, which we had hoped for.
The research carried out on these anagama clays has spawned an interest among
some of the Loughborough students into developing their own clays for this
type of firing, and also for use in other types of firings and applications.
All the members of the group firing the Wysing anagama have diverse aesthetic
aims as far as the objects they produce, and it must not be forgotten that
the most important element in all our minds is that the surface is appropriate
for our work. The surfaces that can be achieved with this type of firing are
unattainable by any other means, and by the manipulation of our raw material,
appropriate surfaces can be achieved for sculptural and domestic work alike.
It is clear that there are an infinite number of ball clay and flux blends
that are still to be investigated, all of which could utilize the anagama
Ben Brierley 2000
|
|